Studying Hamon (刃文, Temper Line)

Perhaps the most visually captivating feature of a Japanese blade is the hamon, or temper line, which runs along the cutting edge. The hamon is the result of differential hardening: when the swordsmith quenches the hot blade, the edge (coated thinner with clay or left partly exposed) hardens into martensitic steel while the rest of the blade cools slower and remains tougher. This process creates a visible boundary where the crystal structure changes. The hamon’s literal meaning is “edge pattern,” and indeed it appears as a patterned line following the edge. Originally, the hamon was a purely functional indicator – it shows that the edge is fully hardened for cutting. However, smiths quickly realized they could control the shape of the hamon for artistic effect. Over time, countless styles of hamon were developed, becoming signatures of schools and individuals. A well-designed hamon not only is beautiful but also contributes to the blade’s resilience by limiting how cracks propagate during use​

When examining a hamon, lighting is key. Use an angled light source (a flashlight or lamp) glancing off the blade to make the hamon appear. Often the hamon will look whitish or bright compared to the darker body of the blade when light catches it. Moving the blade under light can make the hamon “flare” into view. Polishing style affects this too: a traditional polish often leaves the hamon slightly frosted or matt in appearance (especially with hadori finish), which can make it stand out as white against a grey body. In other conditions, the hamon might appear a subtle difference in luster or color (for instance, in direct light it may look like a silver mist). Train yourself to adjust the blade’s angle until the hamon’s outline is sharply visible. Then trace it mentally from the machi (notch at the start of edge) all the way through the boshi (tip area).

Hamon styles: Broadly, hamon are categorized as either straight or irregular. In Japanese terms: suguha (直刃) refers to a straight hamon with little deviation, and midare-ba (乱れ刃) refers to an “irregular” hamon that undulates​. If midare, there are further descriptive subtypes based on the pattern’s shape​

  • Notare (湾れ) – a wavy, undulating hamon with wide gentle waves like ocean swells.
  • Gunome (互の目) – a repeating scallop or zig-zag pattern, often described as a row of semi-circles or “cloves”. Gunome can be large or small, regular or irregular.
  • Chōji (丁子) – literally “clove pattern”, which looks like a series of cloves or flower petals. This is essentially a specific type of gunome-midare with rounded tops and narrow necks, resembling a string of clover shapes. Classic Bizen swords (Ichimonji school) are famed for exuberant ō-choji hamon.
  • Tōran (濤瀾) – a “billowing waves” pattern, basically a larger notare-midare with rolling wave-like peaks.
  • Hitatsura (皆焼, “full temper”) – a special case where the hamon is so extensive that it spreads over much of the blade with patches of hardening even in the ji. Hitatsura looks like a wild midare where areas above the main hamon are also hardened (spots of tobiyaki, etc.)​. It’s seen mainly in late Muromachi Soshu-influenced works (e.g., Sengo Muramasa blades often have hitatsura). Hitatsura is not a shape per se but a condition of having temper all over.

There are countless variations and combinations – smiths often mixed patterns, e.g. gunome-choji-midare (gunome and choji mixed), notare-gunome, etc. Many hamon names in appraisal descriptions get very granular (e.g., “sanbonsugi” – a Mino pattern of triple clove shapes, or “ya-ha” arrow feather pattern, etc.), but the above are main categories. An advanced collector will memorize which hamon styles were favored by which traditions: e.g. the Yamato schools usually did suguha or gentle notare; Kamakura Bizen did flamboyant choji-midare; Mino did gunome-midare often with togari (pointed gunome); Soshu did wild midare with lots of nie; Edo-period Hizen blades often did a uniform ko-midare or suguha; etc. This helps immensely in identification.

Examine not just the shape outline of the hamon, but also its internal characteristics, collectively called hataraki (“activities” or workings in the hamon). A truly great hamon is like a night sky of activity when viewed under light – it’s full of details that indicate the skill of the smith and the quality of the quench. Key hataraki to look for include:

  • Nioi and Nie: These are the fundamental structures of the hamon. Nioi (匂) is a fine, misty crystalline structure – it looks like a faint cloud or haze defining the hamon’s boundary. Nie (沸) are larger individual martensite crystals that sparkle like tiny grains or stars​markussesko.com. If you see the hamon edge glittering with little bright dots, that’s nie. Some swords have a nioi-deki hamon (mostly nioi, very fine grain, typical of many Bizen and Shinto hamon), others are nie-deki (packed with nie, typical of Soshu masterpieces)​japaneseswordindex.com. Often it’s intermediate with ko-nie (small nie grains)​. Recognizing the difference is important: nie gives a rougher, brighter appearance and often accompanies more vibrant hataraki like kinsuji, whereas nioi hamon appear smoother and more silvery.
  • Ashi (足, “legs”): These are downward streaks of softer pattern extending from the hamon toward the edge​japaneseswordindex.com. They look like small thin lines or fingers of hamon that dip into the hardening. Ashi are commonly seen in midare hamon – for instance, choji-midare often has ashi dropping from each clove, giving the pattern a more detailed look. Functionally, ashi are said to help stop fractures by segmenting the hardened edge. When viewing, ashi will appear as slightly darker lines cutting through the hamon outline. Long ashi are a hallmark of good Bizen work.
  • Yō (葉, “leaves”): Similar to ashi but usually referring to streaks that curve or appear on the upper part of the hamon towards the ji. They are like little offshoots or “leaves” inside the hamon pattern.
  • Sunagashi (砂流し, “sand streaks”): These are intricate, feathery lines often seen paralleling the hamon or sweeping within it, looking like brush strokes or trails of sand. Sunagashi usually manifests in nie-rich hamon. They can appear as darkish cloudy streaks or bright lines depending on lighting. Often, sunagashi accompanies hitatsura or wild midare, especially Soshu-den blades. If you hold the blade just right, you might see the hamon filled with fine streaks – that’s sunagashi, indicating the steel’s layers interacting with the hardening.
  • Kinsuji and Inazuma (金筋・稲妻, “golden lines” and “lightning”): These are perhaps the most prized hataraki. They are bright, shining lines of hardened steel that flash in the hamon or ji​. Kinsuji typically refers to a sharp, thin line running longitudinally in or along the hamon, looking like a thread of gold. Inazuma (lightning) are similar, often more jagged or forked, sometimes between the hamon and the body​. These occur due to bands of higher carbon or sudden cooling effects. Kinsuji and inazuma are frequently seen in top Soshu works (Masamune’s blades are famously full of kinsuji) and good late Kamakura Bizen pieces. They can be tricky to spot – one needs the right light angle to catch them. But once seen, they appear as if someone etched a fine line of light into the steel. The presence of plentiful kinsuji/sunagashi is a strong indicator of a masterpiece level blade.
  • Uchinoke: These are small semi-circular sweepings at the edge of the hamon, often looking like tiny hooks or crescents just outside the hamon line​. They can occur when the quench causes little hardened spots that then get partially tempered back. Uchinoke are sometimes seen in midare hamon of Soshu/Mino blades. They appear as whitish half-moon shapes overlapping the hamon outline.
  • Nijūba & Sanjūba: Meaning double or triple hamon lines – occasionally a sword will have a secondary hamon line running parallel to the main one (often faint). This is a quenching artifact that can be quite beautiful, giving a “shadow” hamon. Some late Shinto smiths deliberately made double hamon.
  • Boshi: Although a part of hamon, the boshi (the tempered pattern in the point) deserves special attention. Examine how the hamon runs into the kissaki. Common boshi styles are komaru (small turn-back in a semicircle)​, jizō (like the silhouette of a Jizō Buddha’s head, a specific rounded style), midare-komi (hamon pattern continues irregularly into the boshi) often ending in hakikake (brush-stroke like streaks at the tip) or yakizume (hamon runs off the tip with no turnback). The boshi is crucial for authentication and health of a blade – if the boshi is missing (burnt off by over-polishing or broken), that’s a fatal flaw. So note if the boshi is intact and what pattern it follows. For example, Rai school blades typically have a gentle jizō boshi, whereas Mino blades might have a straight yakizume boshi, etc.

All these activities require a proper polish to be visible. A dull or amateur polish might make a hamon look lifeless or even obscure it entirely. In some traditionally polished blades, the polisher uses a hazuya stone to whiten the hamon (creating the frosty look in a hadori polish), which can make certain fine details like ashi or kinsuji a bit harder to see unless you look closely under angled light. In a sashikomi (old style) polish, the hamon is less cosmetically enhanced, so you might more easily see internal activities but the hamon will appear less starkly white. Understanding how polish affects what you see is part of advanced appreciation.

Now, hamon interpretation also plays into kantei. Certain hamon patterns are strongly associated with schools: e.g., choji-midare with long ashi and yo → Bizen (especially Fukuoka Ichimonji)​; suguha with ko-nie → many schools but if combined with certain jihada could scream Yamashiro; sudare-ba (curtain pattern) → Gassan copies or Yokoyama Bizen; sanbonsugi (triple cedars) → Mino Kanefusa line, etc. Additionally, how the nioi-guchi (the hamon line) looks – is it tight and consistent or wide and billowing? Bright or dull? – factors into quality judgments. A “tight nioi-guchi with bright consistent nioi” is often praised in Shinto blades, whereas “coarse nie with exuberant hataraki” might describe a top Soshu piece.

One should also learn to distinguish a natural hamon from an etched hamon on modern replicas. Many fake or low-end swords have acid-etched hamon that lack the fine activities. They look overly uniform and, under magnification, you won’t see the crystal structures (nioi/nie) – instead it’s just a cloudy line etched on. A true hamon will show the granular nioi texture and is part of the steel, not just a surface effect.

When viewing hamon, move your eyes along the blade in sections. Study the monouchi (the portion near the tip which was the main cutting area) – is the hamon there healthy and present? Check the boshi carefully – does it turn back properly? Look for any breaks in the hamon (a spot where the hamon line is hard to see or disappears – a potential fatal flaw called hamon ware or yaki-dashi issues). Luckily, most flaws in the hamon are obvious, but sometimes a hamon can be very faint if a blade was tired or over-polished. Advanced collectors might even use a small magnifying glass in good light to hunt for tiny kinsuji or nebulae of nie.

In summary, the hamon is the “soul” of the sword’s edge – it reveals the blade’s functional design and the smith’s artistic intent. Appreciate it both from a distance (the overall pattern) and up close (the myriad hataraki within it). A masterpiece blade will keep revealing new aspects the more you study the hamon. Comparing hamon with reference oshigata (sketches) or photographs of known blades by a certain smith can confirm attributions; many smiths had unique hamon signatures. For instance, if you suspect a blade is by Hizen Tadahiro, you’d look for the tight nioi-deki midare with ashi that he was known for, and compare with references. The hamon, along with jihada, forms the primary “fingerprint” of a swordsmith​. Thus, studying it in detail is both an enjoyable aesthetic experience and a critical analytical exercise in kantei.

An antique katana blade viewed under angled light, revealing a bright midare hamon. Note the irregular clove-like waves and the nioi-based “white” line of the hamon, with some ashi (small streaks) descending from the peaks.


As you become more experienced, you’ll start to recognize even very subtle traits – like a slightly wider habuchi (hamon border) peppered with nie that might indicate Soshu influence, or a very straight, consistent hamon that might indicate a Kazusa or Yamato blade. You’ll also come to appreciate the hamon for its sheer beauty – the way it looks like a frosty ripple or a flash of lightning frozen in steel. This is the unique magic of nihontō: functional beauty. The hamon exemplifies that concept.